Is talk about ‘human nature’ in “crisis” as Ernst Cassirer (1944) postulated? Is ‘human nature’ even a “Western illusion,” as Marshall Sahlins (2008) recently suggested? Does it exist? If it exists, what does it amount to and why should we care about it? Can sciences tell us what it amounts to? Do humans use it as an ideal, i.e. to ascribe normatively how humans should be? Is it a social tool, used to exclude people on the margins of a society (e.g. poor people) or specific groups (e.g. refugees, ethnic groups, women) by perceiving them as ‘less human’? These and similar questions will concern us in this course.
After a historical and systematic introduction, we will start with Marshall Sahlins (2008) challenging book “The Western illusion of human nature” and then go into material related to the study of human nature in Post-WW2 sciences. We will then diversify our perspectives with selected scientific and philosophical papers from the recent collection “Arguing about human nature” (2013), ed. by S. Downes and E. Machery, and read further material pertinent to issues such as essentialism, genealogy, innateness, nature-nurture, dehumanization, normalcy, enhancement, pluralism versus unity of science.
Ample room will be provided for the specific research interests of students and no specific philosophical background knowledge is necessary. Students will be encouraged to follow their own interest, disciplinary background, material covered. During the course students will have to already formulate their own research proposal, which they develop over the last weeks into their final paper (3000 words) under the guidance of the lecturer. This will also involve triadic feedback groups.